Durdana Najam
Women had to travel miles before they could make the world realize that leadership had more than one gender. Until a few decades ago, women had to endure in newsrooms typical conventional denigrating looks which essentially suggested; “you are not good enough for the job.”
The journey from unwanted to the wanted has been strewn with visible discrimination such as ow pay checks as compared to what men received and hard beats reserved for men. Women reporters were largely restricted to the coverage of ifestyle /showbiz.
Aggressive questioning, often rude behaviour and zero involvement in decision making—a forte that only men could hold – were other manifestations of discrimination. It took nerves to function in a power structure sustained by men. Though conditions are far better for women today, it still can not be called a smooth sailing. Even in developed countries like the USA and UK female journalists have to struggle to gain ground. In countries like Pakistan, she has yet to cross over the “middlebrow talent” definition.
Not that women completely failed in Pakistan in the field of journalism. Several established names in journalism – Razia Bhatti, Maleeha Lodhi, Fozia Shahid, Nasim Zehra, and some others- do stand out as examples of excellence, yet female participation is abysmally low i.e., lower than five percent.
A survey, conducted by International Alert in 2017, highlighted a number of challenges faced by female journalists in Pakistan, such as: harassment; forced adoption of masculine traits; absence of support from women co-workers; unhospitable environment during night shifts and inadequate maternity leaves, that are often unpaid. Of all these challenges, one that impacts the most is refusing to respond to improper advances from those in the position of power. The survey, which was conducted in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, highlighted that almost one in two journalists experienced gender-based violence during the course of their work.
Another survey, conducted by the Digital Rights Foundation in 2019, entitled “Female Journalists in News Media: Experience, Challenges and a gendered approach”, stated:
“The women in our study really wanted more support from the editors and supervisors. They wanted to be believed. They wanted their news organizations to take action—from deleting comments quickly to training journalists on how to deal with abuse. Many of the women we interviewed felt unsupported or even afraid to complain about the problems to their supervisors. That suggests that newsroom leaders need to change the culture at their organizations to deal with this issue.”
Similar responses were recorded in a survey conducted by another non-profit organization, Media Matters for Democracy to assess the challenges faced by women working online. The report revealed that 77 percent of women journalists used self-censorship to avoid online harassment that had taken a toll on both their personal and professional life. Their complaints also mostly went unheard by the law enforcement agencies.
As compared to men, women are hauled up on social media even if they merely challenge a certain narrative or policy, primarily because of the inherent dislike for female opinion.
At a time when media is passing through a tough phase because of declining revenues and indirect controls/advices, forcing media organizations to lay off employees in droves, ‘establishing oneself’ is an issue facing both genders. Lately, deaths of many young journalists have been attributed to their financial hardships. As a common practice, media outlets either refuse to pay in time or seek free of cost services to “manage their expenses.” The façade to cover this behaviour is usually the government’s advertisement, which, as the refrain goes, are few to come by and that too at a cost that hardly makes a difference to the coffer. This is neither a whole truth nor a complete farce.
This rueful situation is partly an outcome of observing a worn-out business model that revolves around broadcasters/newsmen/reporters rather than consumers. News style that does not fit into the consumer behaviour, marked by diminishing attention span and multi-tasking, is set to fail. News can no longer be understood in its traditional sense of “dog bites men or men bites dog.” Rather, like any marketable product, it must excite readers and prompt them to viral the news across a whole gamut of online media outlets: appealing to both speed and brevity.
Returning to our topic: Has this new development made life easier for women or harder? If in good times they had to swim through rough tides, bad times would have tested them even more fiercely.
Until 2018 a fraction of women could make it to the top positions in media, promotions came by slowly and pay checks still slimmer when compared to those for men. As far sexual predators, women still had to contend with this “plain old disrespect,” said former television executive Kate O’Brien. The #MeToo movement has also vividly illustrated that women still have to bear with a range of toxic male behavior.
The journey to complete independence or to an unfettered work environment may still take decades, yet the odds MUST NOT stop them from standing up and speaking for their rights.
